↓ Skip to main content

Gap-filling eddy covariance methane fluxes: Comparison of machine learning model predictions and uncertainties at FLUXNET-CH4 wetlands

Overview of attention for article published in Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Gap-filling eddy covariance methane fluxes: Comparison of machine learning model predictions and uncertainties at FLUXNET-CH4 wetlands
Published in
Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, October 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108528
Authors

Jeremy Irvin, Sharon Zhou, Gavin McNicol, Fred Lu, Vincent Liu, Etienne Fluet-Chouinard, Zutao Ouyang, Sara Helen Knox, Antje Lucas-Moffat, Carlo Trotta, Dario Papale, Domenico Vitale, Ivan Mammarella, Pavel Alekseychik, Mika Aurela, Anand Avati, Dennis Baldocchi, Sheel Bansal, Gil Bohrer, David I Campbell, Jiquan Chen, Housen Chu, Higo J Dalmagro, Kyle B Delwiche, Ankur R Desai, Eugenie Euskirchen, Sarah Feron, Mathias Goeckede, Martin Heimann, Manuel Helbig, Carole Helfter, Kyle S Hemes, Takashi Hirano, Hiroki Iwata, Gerald Jurasinski, Aram Kalhori, Andrew Kondrich, Derrick YF Lai, Annalea Lohila, Avni Malhotra, Lutz Merbold, Bhaskar Mitra, Andrew Ng, Mats B Nilsson, Asko Noormets, Matthias Peichl, A. Camilo Rey-Sanchez, Andrew D Richardson, Benjamin RK Runkle, Karina VR Schäfer, Oliver Sonnentag, Ellen Stuart-Haëntjens, Cove Sturtevant, Masahito Ueyama, Alex C Valach, Rodrigo Vargas, George L Vourlitis, Eric J Ward, Guan Xhuan Wong, Donatella Zona, Ma. Carmelita R Alberto, David P Billesbach, Gerardo Celis, Han Dolman, Thomas Friborg, Kathrin Fuchs, Sébastien Gogo, Mangaliso J Gondwe, Jordan P Goodrich, Pia Gottschalk, Lukas Hörtnagl, Adrien Jacotot, Franziska Koebsch, Kuno Kasak, Regine Maier, Timothy H Morin, Eiko Nemitz, Walter C Oechel, Patricia Y Oikawa, Keisuke Ono, Torsten Sachs, Ayaka Sakabe, Edward A Schuur, Robert Shortt, Ryan C Sullivan, Daphne J Szutu, Eeva-Stiina Tuittila, Andrej Varlagin, Joeseph G Verfaillie, Christian Wille, Lisamarie Windham-Myers, Benjamin Poulter, Robert B Jackson

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 182 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 15%
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Master 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Student > Bachelor 6 3%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 85 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 33 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 8%
Computer Science 7 4%
Engineering 7 4%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 94 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,223,379
of 34,546,575 outputs
Outputs from Agricultural & Forest Meteorology
#346
of 3,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,419
of 467,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agricultural & Forest Meteorology
#12
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,546,575 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.