↓ Skip to main content

国道158号線猿なぎ洞門崖崩れ

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japan society of photogrammetry and remote sensing, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
国道158号線猿なぎ洞門崖崩れ
Published in
Journal of the Japan society of photogrammetry and remote sensing, March 2010
DOI 10.4287/jsprs.31.2
Authors

田口 直人, 土居原 健

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2021.
All research outputs
#16,375,964
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan society of photogrammetry and remote sensing
#22
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,690
of 104,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan society of photogrammetry and remote sensing
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one scored the same or higher as 16 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.