You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Life cycle assessment of edible insects (Protaetia brevitarsis seulensis larvae) as a future protein and fat source
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-021-93284-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amin Nikkhah, Sam Van Haute, Vesna Jovanovic, Heejung Jung, Jo Dewulf, Tanja Cirkovic Velickovic, Sami Ghnimi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Italy | 1 | 11% |
| Serbia | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Belgium | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 48 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 14% |
| Engineering | 9 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 47 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,389,602
of 25,347,437 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#13,469
of 139,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,343
of 433,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#399
of 4,383 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,347,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 139,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,383 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.