Missing the target: Characterization of bullous pemphigoid patients who are negative using the BP180 enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, October 2012

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent: 2 patents
f1000: 1 research highlight platform

guideline: 1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley: 41 Mendeley

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	Missing the target: Characterization of bullous pemphigoid patients who are negative using the BP180 enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay
Published in	Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, October 2012
DOI	10.1016/j.jaad.2012.09.012
Pubmed ID	23083837
Authors	Janet A. Fairley, Matthew Bream, Colleen Fullenkamp, Sergei Syrbu, Mei Chen, Kelly N. Messingham
Abstract	Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune blistering disease characterized by autoantibodies specific for the 180-kd BP antigen-2 (BP180) (also termed "type XVII collagen") protein. The BP180 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is specific for the immunodominant NC16A domain of the protein. However, we and others have observed patients whose reactivity to BP180 is exclusive of the NC16A domain (referred to henceforth as non-NC16A BP).

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country	Count	As %
Italy	1	2%
Unknown	40	98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status	Count	As %
Student > Ph. D. Student	6	15%
Student > Postgraduate	6	15%
Student > Doctoral Student	5	12%
Researcher	5	12%
Student > Bachelor	4	10%
Other	8	20%
Unknown	7	17%

Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline	Count	As %
Medicine and Dentistry	23	56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology	2	5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences	2	5%
Immunology and Microbiology	2	5%
Psychology	1	2%
Other	3	7%
Unknown	8	20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2026.

All research outputs

#4,291,658

of 32,539,387 outputs

Outputs from Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

#2,874

of 13,088 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#28,512

of 221,750 outputs

Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

#11

of 63 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 32,539,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 13,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.