You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection vs Sham Injection on Tendon Dysfunction in Patients With Chronic Midportion Achilles Tendinopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2021.6986 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca S. Kearney, Chen Ji, Jane Warwick, Nicholas Parsons, Jaclyn Brown, Paul Harrison, Jonathan Young, Matthew L. Costa, Kishore Dasari, Anna Chapman, Michael Carmont, Fraser Harrold, Jitendra Mangwani, David Loveday, Chris Blundell, Carolyn Chadwick, David Townshend, Kiran Putchakayala, Jagan Velpula, Simon Barnes, Sankalp Tripani, Anne-Marie Hutchison, Mike Hennessy, Evangelos Maxlous, Gillian Jackson, Ashtin Goorgakant, Caroline Lever, Joseph Alsousou, Mark Bloomfield, Andrew Williams, Andrew Bing, Sanjeev Madan, Andrew Hannah, Zain Abiddin, Adrian Hughes, Andrew Kelly, Rod Hammett, James Williams, Miriam Day, Aureola Tong, Gafin Morgan, Gavin Clague, Callum Clark, Ngwe Phyo, Shelain Patel, Naveethan Sivanadarajah, Anil Prasanna, Jasdeep Giddie, Ravindran Ranjith, Gurbinder Nandhara, Vineet Trivedi, Rajiv Limaye, Paul Hodgson, Abhijit Guha, Manoj Sivan, Rajarshi Bhattacharya, Dimitri Amiras |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 341 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 61 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 31 | 9% |
| Spain | 26 | 8% |
| Australia | 18 | 5% |
| France | 13 | 4% |
| Canada | 13 | 4% |
| Italy | 6 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 6 | 2% |
| India | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 53 | 16% |
| Unknown | 109 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 213 | 62% |
| Scientists | 62 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 60 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 206 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Researcher | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 18% |
| Unknown | 100 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 103 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 283. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2026.
All research outputs
#158,906
of 34,620,809 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#2,330
of 42,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,738
of 476,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#47
of 325 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,620,809 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 325 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.