↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the relationship between citation set size, team size and screening methods used in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evaluating the relationship between citation set size, team size and screening methods used in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12874-021-01335-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Librarian 2 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 14 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Computer Science 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 15 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,424,881
of 29,726,251 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#919
of 2,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,210
of 462,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#21
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,726,251 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.