↓ Skip to main content

Cohort study of mesenteric panniculitis and its relationship to malignancy

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Surgery, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cohort study of mesenteric panniculitis and its relationship to malignancy
Published in
British Journal of Surgery, August 2016
DOI 10.1002/bjs.10229
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mesenteric panniculitis (MP) is a rare condition that historically has been associated with the presence of malignancy. Paraneoplastic phenomena in general regress with cure and in most cases with treatment of the cancer. This study was undertaken to determine whether MP regressed with cancer treatment and cure. This was a retrospective review of a database of all patients with MP confirmed on CT between 2003 and August 2015 at Christchurch Hospital. Patients were categorized as having malignant or non-malignant disease, and follow-up scans were assessed for remission of MP. Patients with malignancy were further categorized as having malignancy cured or not cured. A total of 308 patients were identified with possible MP; 135 were excluded as radiological appearances were not typical of MP (43 patients) or there was no follow-up CT (92). Of 173 patients (131 men) included, 75 (43·4 per cent) were diagnosed with malignancy. Follow-up imaging showed that 33 patients (19·1 per cent) had remission of MP, whereas 140 (80·9 per cent) had no remission. There was no difference in the rates of MP remission in the malignancy versus no malignancy groups (P = 1·000), or between groups in which malignancy was cured or not cured (P = 0·572). Nor was there any difference in the rates of MP remission in malignancy cured versus no malignancy groups (P = 0·524). MP does not behave like a paraneoplastic phenomenon. The association with malignancy is most likely an epiphenomenon of the many CT images acquired for staging of cancer.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 67%
Unknown 4 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2017.
All research outputs
#23,973,047
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Surgery
#7,118
of 8,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,203
of 334,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Surgery
#56
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.