↓ Skip to main content

Subacute Pain after Traumatic Brain Injury Is Associated with Lower Insular N-Acetylaspartate Concentrations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurotrauma, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Subacute Pain after Traumatic Brain Injury Is Associated with Lower Insular N-Acetylaspartate Concentrations
Published in
Journal of Neurotrauma, January 2016
DOI 10.1089/neu.2015.4098
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Persistent pain is experienced by over 50% of people who sustain a traumatic brain injury (TBI) and over 30% experience significant pain as early as six weeks after injury. Although neuropathic pain is a common consequence after CNS injuries, little attention has been given to neuropathic pain symptoms after TBI. MRS studies in subjects with TBI show decreased brain concentrations of <i>N</i>-acetylaspartate (NAA), a marker of neuronal density and viability. Although decreased brain NAA has been associated with neuropathic pain associated with spinal cord injury (SCI) and diabetes, this relationship has not been examined after TBI. The primary purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that lower NAA concentrations in brain areas involved in pain perception and modulation would be associated with greater severity of neuropathic pain symptoms. Participants with TBI underwent volumetric MR spectroscopy, pain and psychosocial interviews. Cluster analysis of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory subscores resulted in two TBI subgroups: The Moderate Neuropathic Pain (n=17; 37.8%), with significantly (p=0.038) lower insular NAA than the Low or no Neuropathic Pain group (n=28; 62.2%), or age- and sex-matched controls (n=45; p<0.001). A hierarchical linear regression analysis controlling for age, sex, and time post-TBI showed that pain severity was significantly (F=11.0; p<0.001) predicted by a combination of lower insular NAA/Cr (p<0.001), lower right insular gray matter fractional volume (p<0.001), female sex (p=0.005), and older age (p=0.039). These findings suggest that neuronal dysfunction in brain areas involved in pain processing is associated with pain after TBI.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 67 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 29 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 12%
Neuroscience 7 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 34 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2019.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurotrauma
#2,073
of 2,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,080
of 402,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurotrauma
#26
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.