↓ Skip to main content

Extracorporeal Life Support in Accidental Hypothermia with Cardiac Arrest—A Narrative Review

Overview of attention for article published in ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 3,560)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
59 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
guideline
2 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Extracorporeal Life Support in Accidental Hypothermia with Cardiac Arrest—A Narrative Review
Published in
ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs, July 2021
DOI 10.1097/mat.0000000000001518
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 7 12%
Other 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Researcher 3 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 32 56%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Unspecified 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 32 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2025.
All research outputs
#1,052,526
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs
#32
of 3,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,824
of 480,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs
#4
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.