↓ Skip to main content

Mean heart dose variation over a course of breath-holding breast cancer radiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Radiology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mean heart dose variation over a course of breath-holding breast cancer radiotherapy
Published in
British Journal of Radiology, September 2016
DOI 10.1259/bjr.20160536
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The purpose of the work was to estimate the dose received by the heart throughout a course of breath holding breast radiotherapy. 113 cone beam CT (CBCT) scans were acquired for 20 patients treated within the HeartSpare 1A study in which both an Active Breathing Control (ABC) device and a voluntary breath hold method (VBH) were used. Predicted mean heart doses were obtained from treatment plans. CBCT scans were imported into a treatment planning system, heart outlines defined, images registered to the CT planning scan and mean heart dose recorded. Two observers outlined two cases three times each to assess inter- and intra-observer variation. There were no statistically significant differences between ABC and VBH heart dose data from CT planning scans, or in the CBCT based estimates of heart dose , and no effect from the order of the breath hold method.Variation in mean heart dose per fraction over the 3 imaged fractions was < 6 cGy without set up correction, decreasing to 3.3 cGy with set-up correction. If scaled to 15 fractions, all difference between predicted and estimated mean heart doses were <0.5Gy and in 80% of cases were <0.25Gy. Variation in mean heart dose was at an acceptable level over the duration of breath-holding radiotherapy and was well predicted by the planning system. Mean heart dose was not adversely affected by fraction to fraction variations throughout a course of heart sparing radiotherapy using two well-established breath-holding methods.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Master 7 15%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 30%
Physics and Astronomy 7 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Engineering 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2016.
All research outputs
#28,780,377
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Radiology
#3,852
of 4,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,117
of 333,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Radiology
#34
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.