↓ Skip to main content

Developing a broader scientific foundation for river restoration: Columbia River food webs

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Developing a broader scientific foundation for river restoration: Columbia River food webs
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2012
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1213408109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 13 5%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 225 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 18%
Student > Master 38 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Professor 16 7%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 48 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 84 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 33%
Engineering 7 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 <1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 56 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2025.
All research outputs
#2,552,119
of 34,404,538 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#29,489
of 118,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,846
of 345,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#246
of 886 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,404,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 886 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.