↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying ‘geographic proximity’: Experiences from the United Kingdom's National Industrial Symbiosis Programme

Overview of attention for article published in Resources, Conservation & Recycling, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Quantifying ‘geographic proximity’: Experiences from the United Kingdom's National Industrial Symbiosis Programme
Published in
Resources, Conservation & Recycling, May 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.02.003
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 226 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 18%
Student > Master 39 17%
Researcher 35 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Professor 10 4%
Other 41 17%
Unknown 51 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 58 25%
Environmental Science 40 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 19 8%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Chemical Engineering 6 3%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 69 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2025.
All research outputs
#6,776,538
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Resources, Conservation & Recycling
#875
of 3,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,997
of 162,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resources, Conservation & Recycling
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.