↓ Skip to main content

Associative sequence learning: the role of experience in the development of imitation and the mirror system

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
475 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Associative sequence learning: the role of experience in the development of imitation and the mirror system
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, August 2009
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2009.0048
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 475 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Italy 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Hungary 2 <1%
Other 11 2%
Unknown 437 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 125 26%
Researcher 86 18%
Student > Master 60 13%
Student > Bachelor 42 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 5%
Other 75 16%
Unknown 65 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 182 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 13%
Neuroscience 44 9%
Social Sciences 19 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 3%
Other 63 13%
Unknown 91 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2019.
All research outputs
#9,387,053
of 27,370,655 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#4,703
of 7,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,871
of 108,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#41
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,370,655 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.