↓ Skip to main content

Implementing the NHS information technology programme: qualitative study of progress in acute trusts

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Implementing the NHS information technology programme: qualitative study of progress in acute trusts
Published in
British Medical Journal, May 2007
DOI 10.1136/bmj.39195.598461.551
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 3%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Cyprus 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 162 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 42 24%
Unknown 35 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 25%
Social Sciences 19 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 18 10%
Computer Science 17 10%
Psychology 12 7%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 42 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2011.
All research outputs
#7,591,076
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#36,582
of 75,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,955
of 124,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#102
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.