↓ Skip to main content

Can weakly nonlinear theory explain Faraday wave patterns near onset?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Fluid Mechanics, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Can weakly nonlinear theory explain Faraday wave patterns near onset?
Published in
Journal of Fluid Mechanics, July 2015
DOI 10.1017/jfm.2015.388
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
China 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 22%
Professor 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 8 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 8 30%
Engineering 5 19%
Mathematics 3 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 10 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2026.
All research outputs
#28,813,827
of 34,603,176 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Fluid Mechanics
#5,989
of 8,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,608
of 299,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Fluid Mechanics
#31
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,603,176 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,857 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.