↓ Skip to main content

Concerning the piece “Kurokami” of the jiuta and nagauta repertoires

Overview of attention for article published in Toyo ongaku kenkyu : the journal of the Society for the Research of Asiatic Music, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Concerning the piece “Kurokami” of the jiuta and nagauta repertoires
Published in
Toyo ongaku kenkyu : the journal of the Society for the Research of Asiatic Music, February 2010
DOI 10.11446/toyoongakukenkyu1936.1984.39
Authors

Mayumi Miyazaki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,032,488
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Toyo ongaku kenkyu : the journal of the Society for the Research of Asiatic Music
#6
of 39 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,909
of 103,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Toyo ongaku kenkyu : the journal of the Society for the Research of Asiatic Music
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 39 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one scored the same or higher as 33 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.