You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Highly contiguous assemblies of 101 drosophilid genomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
eLife, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.7554/elife.66405 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bernard Y Kim, Jeremy R Wang, Danny E Miller, Olga Barmina, Emily Delaney, Ammon Thompson, Aaron A Comeault, David Peede, Emmanuel RR D'Agostino, Julianne Pelaez, Jessica M Aguilar, Diler Haji, Teruyuki Matsunaga, Ellie E Armstrong, Molly Zych, Yoshitaka Ogawa, Marina Stamenković-Radak, Mihailo Jelić, Marija Savić Veselinović, Marija Tanasković, Pavle Erić, Jian-Jun Gao, Takehiro K Katoh, Masanori J Toda, Hideaki Watabe, Masayoshi Watada, Jeremy S Davis, Leonie C Moyle, Giulia Manoli, Enrico Bertolini, Vladimír Košťál, R Scott Hawley, Aya Takahashi, Corbin D Jones, Donald K Price, Noah Whiteman, Artyom Kopp, Daniel R Matute, Dmitri A Petrov |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 8% |
| France | 5 | 6% |
| India | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 27 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 50% |
| Scientists | 40 | 48% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 116 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 25% |
| Researcher | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 32% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 30 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#817,832
of 25,859,234 outputs
Outputs from eLife
#2,562
of 15,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,340
of 449,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from eLife
#92
of 550 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,859,234 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 550 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.