You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Response of palila and other subalpine Hawaiian forest bird species to prolonged drought and habitat degradation by feral ungulates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.013 |
| Authors |
Paul C. Banko, Richard J. Camp, Chris Farmer, Kevin W. Brinck, David L. Leonard, Robert M. Stephens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 44% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 93% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Researcher | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 23% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2012.
All research outputs
#1,699,686
of 25,597,324 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,422
of 6,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,049
of 290,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#18
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,597,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.