You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
神経内科専門医基本領域化に何が必要か:揺れる専門医制度と基本領域専門医の使命(第60回日本神経学会学術大会 緊急シンポジウム抄録集)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Rinshō shinkeigaku Clinical neurology, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.5692/clinicalneurol.60.cn-001476 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
園生 雅弘, 迫井 正深, 渡辺 憲, 冨本 秀和, 安藤 哲朗, 西山 和利, 髙橋 良輔, 戸田 達史, 日本神経学会神経内科専門医基本領域化推進対策本部 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
#17,646,478
of 25,866,425 outputs
Outputs from Rinshō shinkeigaku Clinical neurology
#302
of 697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,417
of 432,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rinshō shinkeigaku Clinical neurology
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,866,425 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 697 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.