| Title |
Effects of guidelines on adeno-tonsillar surgery on the clinical behaviour of otorhinolaryngologists in Italy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6815-13-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giovanni Motta, Sergio Motta, Pasquale Cassano, Salvatore Conticello, Massimo Ferretti, Bruno Galletti, Aldo Garozzo, Gennaro Larotonda, Nicola Mansi, Emilio Mevio, Gaetano Motta, Giuseppe Quaremba, Agostino Serra, Vincenzo Tarantino, Paolo Tavormina, Claudio Vicini, Giovanni Maurizio Vigili, Domenico Testa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
| Professor | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 71% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,656,056
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
#23
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,951
of 284,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them