↓ Skip to main content

A review of hearing voices groups: Evidence and mechanisms of change

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Psychology Review, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A review of hearing voices groups: Evidence and mechanisms of change
Published in
Clinical Psychology Review, March 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.03.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 175 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 30 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Student > Master 23 13%
Researcher 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 36 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 100 55%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 41 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,729,771
of 32,300,445 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychology Review
#464
of 1,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,224
of 151,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychology Review
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,300,445 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.