↓ Skip to main content

わが国での電気痙攣療法の現況

Overview of attention for article published in THE JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
わが国での電気痙攣療法の現況
Published in
THE JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, July 2020
DOI 10.2199/jjsca.40.393
Authors

鮫島 達夫, 奥村 正紀, 濱田 文仁, 大西 良, 三野原 義光

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2021.
All research outputs
#17,540,466
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from THE JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL ANESTHESIA
#110
of 177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,808
of 430,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from THE JOURNAL OF JAPAN SOCIETY FOR CLINICAL ANESTHESIA
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them