↓ Skip to main content

Effects of mobile Internet use on college student pedestrian injury risk

Overview of attention for article published in Accident Analysis & Prevention, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
318 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effects of mobile Internet use on college student pedestrian injury risk
Published in
Accident Analysis & Prevention, November 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2012.11.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

College-age individuals have the highest incidence of pedestrian injuries of any age cohort. One factor that might contribute to elevated pedestrian injuries among this age group is injuries incurred while crossing streets distracted by mobile devices.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 308 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 15%
Student > Bachelor 34 11%
Researcher 32 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 64 20%
Unknown 69 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 72 23%
Psychology 42 13%
Social Sciences 26 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 7%
Other 51 16%
Unknown 85 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,665,214
of 28,829,220 outputs
Outputs from Accident Analysis & Prevention
#339
of 3,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,865
of 300,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Accident Analysis & Prevention
#4
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,829,220 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.