↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Tree Spatial Structure, Host Composition and Resource Availability Influence Mirid Density or Black Pod Prevalence in Cacao Agroforests in Cameroon
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0109405
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 131 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 19%
Researcher 22 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 39 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 40%
Environmental Science 14 10%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 42 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#12,359,716
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#108,157
of 224,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,452
of 300,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,492
of 5,293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.