↓ Skip to main content

Modeling Cytoskeletal Traffic: An Interplay between Passive Diffusion and Active Transport

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review Letters, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Modeling Cytoskeletal Traffic: An Interplay between Passive Diffusion and Active Transport
Published in
Physical Review Letters, February 2013
DOI 10.1103/physrevlett.110.098102
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 61 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 33%
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 34 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Mathematics 4 6%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 7 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2013.
All research outputs
#9,114,800
of 29,094,772 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review Letters
#17,659
of 44,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,298
of 213,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review Letters
#236
of 700 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,094,772 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 700 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.