↓ Skip to main content

Distinct requirements for T-bet in gut innate lymphoid cells

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Experimental Medicine, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Distinct requirements for T-bet in gut innate lymphoid cells
Published in
The Journal of Experimental Medicine, December 2012
DOI 10.1084/jem.20122097
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Interleukin (IL)-22-producing innate lymphoid cells (ILCs; ILC22) comprise a heterogeneous population of cells that are dependent on the transcription factor retinoid-related orphan γt (RORγt) and are critical for barrier function of the intestinal mucosa. A distinct ILC22 subset expresses the natural cytotoxicity receptor NKp46 (NKp46+ ILC22); however, the factors that contribute to the generation of this population versus other subsets are largely unknown. Herein, we show that T-bet (encoded by Tbx21) was highly expressed in NKp46+ ILC22, a feature shared by all NKp46+ cells present in the intestine but not by other IL-22-producing populations. Accordingly, the absence of T-bet resulted in loss of NKp46+ ILC22 in the intestinal lamina propria. The residual NKp46+ ILC22 present in Tbx21(-/-) mice showed a marked reduction of Rorγt expression and impairment in IL-22 production. Generation and functions of gut NK1.1+ cells were also altered. Bone marrow chimera experiments revealed a cell-intrinsic requirement for T-bet in these subsets and competitive reconstitution experiments revealed roles for T-bet in multiple ILC subsets. Thus, T-bet has a general importance for ILC in the gut and plays a selective and critical role in the generation of NKp46+ ILC22.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 153 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 30%
Researcher 38 24%
Student > Master 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 50 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 8%
Neuroscience 2 1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 24 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2012.
All research outputs
#24,087,238
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Experimental Medicine
#12,697
of 13,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,890
of 344,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Experimental Medicine
#37
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,367 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.