↓ Skip to main content

Genetic bases of rice grain shape: so many genes, so little known

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Plant Science, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
320 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Genetic bases of rice grain shape: so many genes, so little known
Published in
Trends in Plant Science, December 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.11.001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa) grain shape is a key determinant of grain yield and market values. Facilitated by advancements in genomics and various molecular markers, more than 400 quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with rice grain traits have been identified. In this review, we examine the genetic bases of rice grain shape, focusing on the protein products of 13 genes that have been cloned and the chromosome locations of 15 QTLs that have been fine mapped. Although more genes affecting grain traits are likely to be cloned in the near future, characterizing their functions at the biochemical level and applying these molecular data to rice breeding programs will be a more challenging task.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Italy 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 311 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 19%
Researcher 55 17%
Student > Master 39 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Student > Bachelor 12 4%
Other 43 13%
Unknown 97 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 184 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 8%
Environmental Science 4 1%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Arts and Humanities 2 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 93 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2012.
All research outputs
#22,576,564
of 27,629,830 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Plant Science
#2,406
of 2,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,603
of 296,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Plant Science
#18
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,629,830 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.