You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Influence on aquatic insects caused by check dam construction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.7211/jjsrt.41.271 |
| Authors |
Mikako KOKUBUN, Natuko TANAKA, Yui SAKAE, Ryouta KAKETANI, Yoshikazu NOZAWA, Takumi MURATU, Hideki TAKIZAWA, Izumi KOSAKA, ABE Kazutoki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 10 | 40% |
| Equatorial Guinea | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,144,709
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology
#6
of 125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,615
of 359,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.