↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
TROUBLED LETTERS BUT NOT NUMBERS: DOMAIN SPECIFIC COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENTS FOLLOWING FOCAL DAMAGE IN FRONTAL CORTEX
Published in
Brain, June 1990
DOI 10.1093/brain/113.3.749
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A well educated right-handed woman developed severe and stable alexia and agraphia following a circumscribed surgical lesion in the left premotor cortex. The lesion was located in Brodmann's field 6, above Broca's area, in the region traditionally referred to as Exner's area. The alexia and agraphia occurred in a pure form, that is, in the setting of otherwise normal cognitive and neurological function. She was not aphasic or hemiparetic and her visual perception, intellect, memory, oral spelling and drawing were normal. The patterns of impairment of reading and writing closely paralleled one another. Reading of single words and letters was severely impaired, and she was entirely unable to read sentences. She was virtually unable to write recognizable letters, could write no words, and her writing attempts were severely distorted spatially. By contrast, she could easily read all numbers and nonverbal symbols, and she was equally able to write numbers and perform written calculations without difficulty. These striking dissociations provide further evidence of the domain specificity of cognitive/neural representations. They also point to the possible role of premotor cortices in the coactivation of precise sequences of motor and sensory activity patterns involved in reading and writing.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
France 1 1%
Finland 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 95 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 12%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 25 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 23%
Neuroscience 11 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Linguistics 4 4%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 28 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2012.
All research outputs
#17,741,039
of 26,005,389 outputs
Outputs from Brain
#6,747
of 7,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,451
of 15,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,005,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them