↓ Skip to main content

To Tube, or Not to Tube: Comparing Ventilation Techniques in Microlaryngeal Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in The Laryngoscope, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
To Tube, or Not to Tube: Comparing Ventilation Techniques in Microlaryngeal Surgery
Published in
The Laryngoscope, August 2021
DOI 10.1002/lary.29750
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 14 50%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 15 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2024.
All research outputs
#26,337,817
of 32,945,511 outputs
Outputs from The Laryngoscope
#6,290
of 9,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#337,850
of 461,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Laryngoscope
#79
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,945,511 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,042 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.