You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Improving evaluation of nonlethal tools for carnivore management and conservation: evaluating fladry to protect an endangered species from a generalist mesocarnivore
|
---|---|
Published in |
Animal Conservation, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.1111/acv.12726 |
Authors |
R. M. Windell, L. L. Bailey, J. K. Young, T. M. Livieri, D. A. Eads, S. W. Breck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 38% |
Germany | 2 | 7% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Portugal | 1 | 3% |
Bangladesh | 1 | 3% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 55% |
Scientists | 10 | 34% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 23% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 5 | 23% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 12 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,429,126
of 24,575,707 outputs
Outputs from Animal Conservation
#221
of 1,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,142
of 422,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Conservation
#9
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,575,707 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.