↓ Skip to main content

Can anxiety and race interact to influence face-recognition accuracy? A systematic literature review

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Can anxiety and race interact to influence face-recognition accuracy? A systematic literature review
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2021
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0254477
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 9%
Researcher 1 5%
Unknown 14 64%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Computer Science 1 5%
Unknown 15 68%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2022.
All research outputs
#23,075,667
of 28,241,322 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#205,677
of 245,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#339,355
of 445,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,255
of 2,741 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,241,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 245,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,741 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.