↓ Skip to main content

Front-crawl stroke-coordination and symmetry: A comparison between timing and net drag force protocols

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Sports Sciences, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Front-crawl stroke-coordination and symmetry: A comparison between timing and net drag force protocols
Published in
Journal of Sports Sciences, December 2012
DOI 10.1080/02640414.2012.750004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study compared stroke-coordination and symmetry using traditional timing methods and net drag force profiles. Twenty elite front-crawl swimmers Federation Internationale de Natation (FINA ranking 908 ± 59) were tested to identify the influence of both gender and breathing. A total of six randomised free-swimming trials were conducted: (i) three breathing, (ii) three non-breathing. Net drag forces were measured using an assisted towing device and the magnitude and location of minimum and maximum was determined to create a stroke symmetry index. Within the breathing condition, there were significant differences between the two symmetry index methods. Using the timing index, all 10 female participants, and seven males, illustrated symmetrical timing. For the net drag force profile, only three females and zero males exhibited a symmetrical minimum net drag force; and only four females and two males demonstrated a symmetrical maximum net drag force index. No differences existed within the non-breathing condition. There was a small (5.2%) difference in the location of maximum net drag force, when stratifying by gender. During the breathing condition, gender also influenced the percentage of overlap for the breathing stroke by 25.2%, and 14.6 % for the non-breathing stroke. A combination of the traditional timing based and net drag force based profile can guide future swimming technique intervention strategies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Lecturer 2 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 19 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 19 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Engineering 3 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 22 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2012.
All research outputs
#17,236,655
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Sports Sciences
#3,385
of 4,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,326
of 286,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Sports Sciences
#39
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.