Disorder and order in unfolded and disordered peptides and proteins: A view derived from tripeptide conformational analysis. I. Tripeptides with long and predominantly hydrophobic side chains
Published in
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, February 2013
We performed a conformational analysis of the central residues of three tripeptides glycyl-L-isoleucyl-glycine (GIG), glycyl-L-tyrosyl-glycine (GYG) and glycyl-L-arginyl-glycine (GRG) in aqueous solution, based on a global analysis of amide I' band profiles and NMR J-coupling constants. The results are compared with recently reported distributions of GVG, GFG and GEG. For GIG and GYG, we found that even though the polyproline II (pPII) fraction is below 0.5, it is still the most populated conformation, whereas GVG and GFG show both a larger β-strand fraction. For GRG, we observed a clear dominance of pPII over β-strand, reminiscent of observations for GEG and GKG. This finding indicates that terminal charges on otherwise hydrophobic residue side chains stabilize pPII over β-strand conformations. For all peptides investigated we found that a variety of compact and turn-like conformations constitute nearly 20 percent of their conformational distributions. Attempts to analyze our data with a simple two-state pPII-->/<--β model therefore do not yield any satisfactory reproduction of experimental results. A comparison of the obtained GxG ensembles with conformational distributions of GxG segments in truncated coil libraries (helices and sheets omitted) revealed a much larger fraction of type II β(i+2) and type III β like conformations for the latter. Thus, a comparison of conformational distributions of unfolded peptide segments in solution and in coil libraries reveal interesting information on how the interplay between intrinsic propensities of amino acid residues and non-local interactions in polypeptide chains determine the conformations of loop segments in proteins.
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science
1
3%
Computer Science
1
3%
Other
2
6%
Unknown
6
17%
Attention Score in Context
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2012.
All research outputs
#22,369,154
of 27,370,655 outputs
Outputs from Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
#2,835
of 3,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,447
of 210,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
#23
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,370,655 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,419 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
