↓ Skip to main content

Irradiated mammary gland stroma promotes the expression of tumorigenic potential by unirradiated epithelial cells.

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Research, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Irradiated mammary gland stroma promotes the expression of tumorigenic potential by unirradiated epithelial cells.
Published in
Cancer Research, March 2000
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We have shown that ionizing radiation, a known carcinogen of human breast, elicits rapid, persistent, and global changes in the mammary microenvironment as evidenced by altered extracellular matrix composition and growth factor activities. To address whether these events contribute to radiogenic carcinogenesis, we evaluated the effect of irradiated mammary stroma on the neoplastic potential of COMMA-D mammary epithelial cells. Although COMMA-D cells harbor mutations in both alleles of p53, they are nontumorigenic when injected s.c. into syngeneic hosts. Unirradiated COMMA-D cells transplanted to mammary fat pads cleared previously of epithelia preferentially formed tumors in irradiated hosts. Tumor incidence at 6 weeks was 81% +/- 12 SE when animals were irradiated with 4 Gy, 3 days prior to transplantation, compared with 19% +/- 2 SE (P < 0.005) in sham-irradiated hosts. This effect was evident when cells were transplanted 1 to 14 days after irradiation. Furthermore, tumors were significantly larger (243.1 +/- 61.3 mm3 versus 30.8 +/- 8.7 mm3) and arose more quickly (100% by 6 weeks versus 39% over 10 weeks in sham hosts) in fat pads in irradiated hosts. The contribution of local versus systemic effects was evaluated using hemibody (left versus right) irradiation; tumors formed only in fat pads on the irradiated side. These data indicate that radiation-induced changes in the stromal microenvironment can contribute to neoplastic progression in vivo. Disruption of solid tissue interactions is a heretofore unrecognized activity of ionizing radiation as a carcinogen.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
France 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 189 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 23%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Professor 12 6%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 28 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 15%
Engineering 10 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 37 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2017.
All research outputs
#12,358,918
of 34,411,289 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#19,096
of 35,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,354
of 60,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#139
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,411,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.