↓ Skip to main content

Mast cells in allergy: Innate instructors of adaptive responses

Overview of attention for article published in Immunobiology, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mast cells in allergy: Innate instructors of adaptive responses
Published in
Immunobiology, May 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.imbio.2007.03.012
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The function of mast cells as effector cells in allergy has been extensively studied. However, increasing insight into mast cell physiology has revealed new mast cell functions and has introduced mast cells as key players in the regulation of innate as well as adaptive immunity. For example, mast cells have recently been found to express Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which enable them to participate in the innate immune response against pathogens. Furthermore, mast cells have been reported to interact with B cells, dendritic cells and T cells and thereby modulate the direction of an adaptive immune response. Finally, recent documentation that mast cells express functional MHC class II and costimulatory molecules and release immunologically active exosomes, has raised the possibility that mast cells also engage in (as yet) poorly understood antigen presentation functions. In this review, we explore the hypothesis that mast cells serve as central mediators between innate and adaptive immunity, rather as pure effector cells, during allergic innate responses.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Egypt 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 68 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 45%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 9 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2012.
All research outputs
#9,227,034
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Immunobiology
#356
of 1,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,900
of 95,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunobiology
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.