↓ Skip to main content

What have we really learned from functional connectivity in clinical populations?

Overview of attention for article published in NeuroImage, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
59 X users

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
What have we really learned from functional connectivity in clinical populations?
Published in
NeuroImage, August 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118466
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 166 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Student > Master 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 4%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 64 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 35 21%
Psychology 17 10%
Computer Science 8 5%
Engineering 8 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 79 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,484,160
of 34,320,268 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage
#719
of 13,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,842
of 464,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage
#10
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,320,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.