↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
370 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inhaled budesonide for COVID-19 in people at high risk of complications in the community in the UK (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, open-label, adaptive platform trial
Published in
The Lancet, August 2021
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01744-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ly-Mee Yu, Mona Bafadhel, Jienchi Dorward, Gail Hayward, Benjamin R Saville, Oghenekome Gbinigie, Oliver Van Hecke, Emma Ogburn, Philip H Evans, Nicholas P B Thomas, Mahendra G Patel, Duncan Richards, Nicholas Berry, Michelle A Detry, Christina Saunders, Mark Fitzgerald, Victoria Harris, Milensu Shanyinde, Simon de Lusignan, Monique I Andersson, Peter J Barnes, Richard E K Russell, Dan V Nicolau, Sanjay Ramakrishnan, F D Richard Hobbs, Christopher C Butler, PRINCIPLE Trial Collaborative Group, Ly-Mee Yu, Mona Bafadhel, Jienchi Dorward, Gail Hayward, Benjamin R Saville, Oghenekome Gbinigie, Oliver van Hecke, Emma Ogburn, Philip H Evans, Nicholas PB Thomas, Mahendra G Patel, Duncan Richards, Nicholas Berry, Michelle A Detry, Christina T Saunders, Mark Fitzgerald, Victoria Harris, Milensu Shanyinde, Simon de Lusignan, Monique I Andersson, Peter J Barnes, Richard EK Russell, Dan V Nicolau, Sanjay Ramakrishnan, FD Richard Hobbs, Christopher C Butler

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,337 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 370 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 38 10%
Researcher 38 10%
Student > Master 31 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 6%
Student > Bachelor 17 5%
Other 64 17%
Unknown 161 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 2%
Other 48 13%
Unknown 180 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2057. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2026.
All research outputs
#5,179
of 34,365,356 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#212
of 51,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238
of 464,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#13
of 371 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,365,356 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 371 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.