↓ Skip to main content

Carcinoids of the ampulla: Long-term follow-up after endoscopic resection.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Carcinoids of the ampulla: Long-term follow-up after endoscopic resection.
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, February 2019
DOI 10.1200/jco.2019.37.4_suppl.430
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2021.
All research outputs
#18,809,260
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#18,567
of 20,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325,815
of 439,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#198
of 214 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 214 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.