Peer 2
I was expecting at least a correction after more than two years from the first post...
I was expecting at least a correction after more than two years from the first post...
There are some more issues regarding this publication I would like to point out:In figure 2, the FITC labeled HR sample does not correspond with the Nomarski micrograph...
Figure 6B.http://i.imgur.com/rO9vmdN.jpg
Figure 6.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039637/figure/F6/Figure 6B. Please compare the Diluent and HR VEGF panels.