↓ Skip to main content

Food Pricing Strategies, Population Diets, and Non-Communicable Disease: A Systematic Review of Simulation Studies

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS Medicine, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
450 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Food Pricing Strategies, Population Diets, and Non-Communicable Disease: A Systematic Review of Simulation Studies
Published in
PLOS Medicine, December 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001353
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 150 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 450 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 2%
New Zealand 3 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 435 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 100 22%
Researcher 64 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 12%
Student > Bachelor 44 10%
Other 29 6%
Other 68 15%
Unknown 93 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 21%
Social Sciences 53 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 25 6%
Other 73 16%
Unknown 112 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 215. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2025.
All research outputs
#228,327
of 34,540,392 outputs
Outputs from PLOS Medicine
#409
of 5,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,211
of 345,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS Medicine
#4
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,540,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 82.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.