↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
53 X users

Readers on

mendeley
320 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Global, regional, and national burden of respiratory tract cancers and associated risk factors from 1990 to 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
Published in
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, August 2021
DOI 10.1016/s2213-2600(21)00164-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

GBD 2019 Respiratory Tract Cancers Collaborators, Hedyeh Ebrahimi, Zahra Aryan, Sahar Saeedi Moghaddam, Catherine Bisignano, Shahabeddin Rezaei, Farhad Pishgar, Lisa M Force, Hassan Abolhassani, Eman Abu-Gharbieh, Shailesh M Advani, Sohail Ahmad, Fares Alahdab, Vahid Alipour, Syed Mohamed Aljunid, Saeed Amini, Robert Ancuceanu, Catalina Liliana Andrei, Tudorel Andrei, Jalal Arabloo, Morteza Arab-Zozani, Malke Asaad, Marcel Ausloos, Atalel Fentahun Awedew, Atif Amin Baig, Ali Bijani, Antonio Biondi, Tone Bjørge, Dejana Braithwaite, Michael Brauer, Hermann Brenner, Maria Teresa Bustamante-Teixeira, Zahid A Butt, Giulia Carreras, Carlos A Castañeda-Orjuela, Odgerel Chimed-Ochir, Dinh-Toi Chu, Michael T Chung, Aaron J Cohen, Kelly Compton, Baye Dagnew, Xiaochen Dai, Lalit Dandona, Rakhi Dandona, Frances E Dean, Meseret Derbew Molla, Abebaw Alemayehu Desta, Tim Robert Driscoll, Emerito Jose A Faraon, Pawan Sirwan Faris, Irina Filip, Florian Fischer, Weijia Fu, Silvano Gallus, Birhan Gebresillassie Gebregiorgis, Ahmad Ghashghaee, Mahaveer Golechha, Kebebe Bekele Gonfa, Giuseppe Gorini, Bárbara Niegia Garcia Goulart, Maximiliano Ribeiro Guerra, Nima Hafezi-Nejad, Samer Hamidi, Simon I Hay, Claudiu Herteliu, Chi Linh Hoang, Nobuyuki Horita, Mihaela Hostiuc, Mowafa Househ, Ivo Iavicoli, Irena M Ilic, Milena D Ilic, Seyed Sina Naghibi Irvani, Farhad Islami, Ashwin Kamath, Supreet Kaur, Rovshan Khalilov, Ejaz Ahmad Khan, Jonathan M Kocarnik, Burcu Kucuk Bicer, G Anil Kumar, Carlo La Vecchia, Qing Lan, Iván Landires, Savita Lasrado, Paolo Lauriola, Elvynna Leong, Bingyu Li, Stephen S Lim, Alan D Lopez, Azeem Majeed, Reza Malekzadeh, Navid Manafi, Ritesh G Menezes, Tomasz Miazgowski, Sanjeev Misra, Abdollah Mohammadian-Hafshejani, Shafiu Mohammed, Ali H Mokdad, Alex Molassiotis, Lorenzo Monasta, Rahmatollah Moradzadeh, Lidia Morawska, Joana Morgado-da-Costa, Shane Douglas Morrison, Mukhammad David Naimzada, Javad Nazari, Cuong Tat Nguyen, Huong Lan Thi Nguyen, Rajan Nikbakhsh, Virginia Nuñez-Samudio, Andrew T Olagunju, Nikita Otstavnov, Stanislav S Otstavnov, P A Mahesh, Adrian Pana, Eun-Kee Park, Faheem Hyder Pottoo, Akram Pourshams, Mohammad Rabiee, Navid Rabiee, Amir Radfar, Alireza Rafiei, Muhammad Aziz Rahman, Pradhum Ram, Priya Rathi, David Laith Rawaf, Salman Rawaf, Nima Rezaei, Nicholas L S Roberts, Thomas J Roberts, Luca Ronfani, Gholamreza Roshandel, Abdallah M Samy, Milena M Santric-Milicevic, Brijesh Sathian, Ione Jayce Ceola Schneider, Mario Sekerija, Sadaf G Sepanlou, Feng Sha, Masood Ali Shaikh, Rajesh Sharma, Aziz Sheikh, Sara Sheikhbahaei, Sudeep K Siddappa Malleshappa, Jasvinder A Singh, Freddy Sitas, Emma Elizabeth Spurlock, Paschalis Steiropoulos, Rafael Tabarés-Seisdedos, Eyayou Girma Tadesse, Ken Takahashi, Eugenio Traini, Bach Xuan Tran, Khanh Bao Tran, Ravensara S Travillian, Marco Vacante, Paul J Villeneuve, Francesco S Violante, Zabihollah Yousefi, Deniz Yuce, Vesna Zadnik, Maryam Zamanian, Kazem Zendehdel, Jianrong Zhang, Zhi-Jiang Zhang, Farshad Farzadfar, Christopher J L Murray, Mohsen Naghavi

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 320 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 7%
Researcher 20 6%
Student > Master 18 6%
Lecturer 17 5%
Other 12 4%
Other 55 17%
Unknown 176 55%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 4%
Environmental Science 9 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 52 16%
Unknown 180 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2023.
All research outputs
#814,507
of 33,005,396 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#534
of 3,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,425
of 440,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
#16
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,005,396 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.