↓ Skip to main content

Mechanisms of Lipotoxicity in the Cardiovascular System

Overview of attention for article published in Current Hypertension Reports, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mechanisms of Lipotoxicity in the Cardiovascular System
Published in
Current Hypertension Reports, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11906-012-0307-2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases account for approximately one third of all deaths globally. Obese and diabetic patients have a high likelihood of dying from complications associated with cardiovascular dysfunction. Obesity and diabetes increase circulating lipids that upon tissue uptake, may be stored as triglyceride, or may be metabolized in other pathways, leading to the generation of toxic intermediates. Excess lipid utilization or activation of signaling pathways by lipid metabolites may disrupt cellular homeostasis and contribute to cell death, defining the concept of lipotoxicity. Lipotoxicity occurs in multiple organs, including cardiac and vascular tissues, and a number of specific mechanisms have been proposed to explain lipotoxic tissue injury. In addition, recent data suggests that increased tissue lipids may also be protective in certain contexts. This review will highlight recent progress toward elucidating the relationship between nutrient oversupply, lipotoxicity, and cardiovascular dysfunction. The review will focus in two sections on the vasculature and cardiomyocytes respectively.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 106 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 20%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 19 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 13%
Unspecified 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 24 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2012.
All research outputs
#15,258,711
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Current Hypertension Reports
#454
of 730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,292
of 172,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Hypertension Reports
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.