↓ Skip to main content

Statin Use and Breast Cancer: Prospective Results From the Women's Health Initiative

Overview of attention for article published in JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Statin Use and Breast Cancer: Prospective Results From the Women's Health Initiative
Published in
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, May 2006
DOI 10.1093/jnci/djj188
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Despite experimental observations suggesting that 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A inhibitors (statins) have antitumor activity, clinical studies have reached mixed conclusions about the relationship between statin use and breast cancer risk.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 82 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Professor 8 9%
Other 6 7%
Other 23 26%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 23 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2026.
All research outputs
#2,713,310
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#1,862
of 9,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,329
of 128,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#15
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,889 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.