You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Ideal Delegation: How Institutional Privilege Silences “Developing” Nations in the UN Climate Negotiations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Social Problems, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1093/socpro/spab040 |
| Authors |
Danielle Falzon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 12% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Ghana | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Saint Kitts and Nevis | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 57% |
| Scientists | 20 | 34% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 6 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#933,812
of 25,824,818 outputs
Outputs from Social Problems
#101
of 1,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,425
of 439,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Problems
#5
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,824,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.