↓ Skip to main content

EXPERIMENTAL LEAD POISONING IN TURKEY VULTURES (CATHARTES AURA)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Diseases, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
EXPERIMENTAL LEAD POISONING IN TURKEY VULTURES (CATHARTES AURA)
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Diseases, January 2003
DOI 10.7589/0090-3558-39.1.96
Pubmed ID
Authors

James W. Carpenter, Oliver H. Pattee, Steven H. Fritts, Barnett A. Rattner, Stanley N. Wiemeyer, J. Andrew Royle, Milton R. Smith

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 124 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Other 10 7%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 20 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 37%
Environmental Science 26 19%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 14 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 26 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2016.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#476
of 1,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,675
of 136,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Diseases
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them