↓ Skip to main content

Architectural characterization of organotypic cultures of H400 and primary rat keratinocytes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Architectural characterization of organotypic cultures of H400 and primary rat keratinocytes
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/jbm.a.34263
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Organotypic epithelial structures can be cultured using primary or immortalized keratinocytes. However, there has been little detailed quantitative histological characterization of such cultures in comparison with normal mucosal architecture. The aim of this study is to identify morphological markers of tissue architecture that can be used to monitor tissue structure, maturation, and differentiation and to enable quantitative comparison of organotypic cultures (OCs) with normal oral mucosa. OCs of oral keratinocytes [immortalized H400 or primary rat keratinocytes (PRKs)] were generated using the three scaffolds of de-epidermalized dermis (DED), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and collagen gels for up to 14 days. Cultures and normal epithelium were analyzed immunohistochemically and by using the semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (sq-RT-PCR) for E-cadherin, desmoglein-3, plakophilin, involucrin, cytokeratins-1, -5, -6, -10, -13, and Ki67. The epithelial thickness of OCs was measured in stained sections using image processing. Histological analysis revealed that air-liquid interface (ALI) cultures generated stratified organotypic epithelial structures by 14-days. The final thickness of these cultures as well as the degree of maturation/stratification (including stratum corneum formation) varied significantly depending on the scaffold used. For certain scaffolds, the immunohistochemical profiles obtained recapitulated those of normal oral epithelium indicating comparable in vitro differentiation and proliferation. In conclusion, quantitative microscopy approaches enabled unbiased architectural characterization of OCs. The scaffold materials used in the present study (DED, collagen type-I and PET) differentially influenced cell behavior in OCs of oral epithelia. H400 and PRK OCs on DED at the ALI demonstrated similar characteristics in terms of gene expression and protein distribution to the normal tissue architecture.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 35%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2012.
All research outputs
#28,747,540
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A
#2,986
of 3,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,444
of 213,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part A
#65
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,340 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.