You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Response to “Connectivity and pore accessibility in models of soil carbon cycling”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Change Biology, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1111/gcb.15850 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bonnie G. Waring, Benjamin N. Sulman, Sasha Reed, A. Peyton Smith, Colin Averill, Courtney A. Creamer, Daniela F. Cusack, Steven J. Hall, Julie D. Jastrow, Andrea Jilling, Kenneth M. Kemner, Markus Kleber, Xiao‐Jun Allen Liu, Jennifer Pett‐Ridge, Marjorie Schulz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 3 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2021.
All research outputs
#15,155,790
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#5,208
of 5,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,145
of 430,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#152
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,457 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.