↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for recruiting smokers into cessation programmes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Interventions for recruiting smokers into cessation programmes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009187.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Tobacco control is a top public health priority around the globe due to the high prevalence of cigarette smoking and its associated morbidity and mortality. Much effort has been focused on establishing the effectiveness of different smoking cessation strategies. This review, however, aims to address the initial challenge faced by smoking cessation programmes: recruitment of smokers.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 276 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 15%
Researcher 42 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 85 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 12%
Psychology 25 9%
Social Sciences 21 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 92 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2019.
All research outputs
#22,947,680
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,746
of 14,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,196
of 344,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#162
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.