↓ Skip to main content

The effect of lung-size mismatch on mechanical ventilation tidal volumes after bilateral lung transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The effect of lung-size mismatch on mechanical ventilation tidal volumes after bilateral lung transplantation
Published in
Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, December 2012
DOI 10.1093/icvts/ivs493
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mechanical ventilation tidal volumes are usually set according to an estimate of patient size in millilitres (ml) per kilogram (kg) body weight. We describe the relationship between donor-recipient lung-size mismatch and postoperative mechanical ventilation tidal volumes according to recipient- and donor-predicted body weights in a cohort of bilateral lung transplant patients.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 7 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Mathematics 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2013.
All research outputs
#28,640,943
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
#1,851
of 2,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,069
of 344,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
#36
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,627 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.